To achieve its mission, Global Freedom of Expression undertakes and commissions research and policy … (Delery, Stuart) (Entered: 12/19/2019), (#1) PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD / Petition to Enforce ICSID Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment against KINGDOM OF SPAIN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6664191) filed by RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) (Entered: 12/20/2019), DocketCase Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. As a reporter, I rely on UniCourt to keep on top of the latest filings and developments on cases involving celebrities and corporations. Economic sector and subsector This refers to the economic sector to which the investment at issue allegedly belongs. The decision on jurisdiction was issued on June 6, 2016 and it is publicly available only in a redacted form. In final RREEF v. Spain award, arbitrators award close to €60 million in compensation for failure to provide a reasonable rate of return Dec 17, 2019. The Court of Justice of the European Union creates precedent according to which Google must erase personal data subsequent to a request by the person concerned By Konstantinos Kakavoulis The case Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (referred to as Google Spain v. Yale University Press. (Delery, Stuart) (Entered: 12/19/2019), Docket(#1) PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD / Petition to Enforce ICSID Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment against KINGDOM OF SPAIN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6664191) filed by RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LexisNexis Webinars Offering minimal impact on your working day, covering the hottest topics and bringing the industry's experts to you whenever and wherever you choose, LexisNexis ® Webinars offer the ideal solution for your training needs. If you do not agree with any of the above, your sole recourse is to not use this website. Administrative Case Number: The claimant was an Argentinian individual who established and invested in a corporation named EAMSA, for the purpose of building a production facility for chemical products in Galicia, Spain. B.S. The Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. LIMITED, RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, District Of Columbia District. Why is this public record being published online? Claimant(s): See case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide. PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD / Petition to Enforce ICSID Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment against KINGDOM OF SPAIN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6664191) filed by RREEF (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Rozen Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 2 - ICSID Convention, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Energy Charter Treaty, # 4 Text of Proposed Order, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet, # 6 Summons)(Delery, Stuart) … LIMITED, RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Rozen Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 - ICSID Convention, #3 Exhibit 3 - Energy Charter Treaty, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(Delery, Stuart) (Entered: 12/19/2019). 1961), Mississippi Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. ARB/13/30) Summary by Natalia Charalampidou, citation details below. The summary of the dispute describes in very general terms the conduct allegedly in breach of IIA obligations as argued by the claimant (non-exhaustive). The Judge overseeing this case is Carl J. Nichols. On 12/19/2019 RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE G P LIMITED filed an Other lawsuit against KINGDOM OF SPAIN. The Respondent considers that the Second Claimant ( RREEF Pan -European Two) , is not a protected investor under the ECT on the basis that it is incorporated in Luxembourg which, like the Kingdom of Spain, is a M ember State of the European Union (“ EU”). ISBN 978-0253190253. If you are a subscriber, please. sign up to receive free email headlines here. ARB/97/7). Summary RREEF v. Spain (ICSID Case No. Other remedy: The Respondent shall pay interests on the sum awarded above from 30 June 2014 to the date of payment of all sums due pursuant to this Award at a rate of 2.07%, compounded monthly. Cases involving other matters not classified elsewhere, 890, 1890, 1990, 2890, 2899, 2999, 3375, 3890, 3896, 3899, 3999, 4890, 4896, 4999, RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LIMITED, RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Rozen Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 - ICSID Convention, #3 Exhibit 3 - Energy Charter Treaty, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(Delery, Stuart) (Entered: 12/19/2019), Docket(#3) SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to KINGDOM OF SPAIN. The Judge overseeing this case is Carl J. Nichols. This will keep you logged in for 2 weeks. RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) Get Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration), 24 I.L.R. And the best part of all, documents in their CrowdSourced Library™ are FREE. RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) (#3) SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to KINGDOM OF SPAIN. On 12/19/2019 RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE G P LIMITED filed an Other lawsuit against KINGDOM OF SPAIN. The decision on jurisdiction was issued on June 6, 2016 and it is publicly available only in a redacted form. Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. The War of Succession in Spain 1700-15. LIMITED et al v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN. V. KINGDOM OF SPAIN, ICSID CASE NO. Facts. ARB/13/30 >Claimant : RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Kamen, Henry (1969). Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to advance understanding of the international and national norms and institutions that best protect the free flow of information and expression in an inter-connected global community with major common challenges to address. Summary. In RREEF v. ISBN 978-0300180541. Shareholding in two solar power plants located in Andalucía, Spain. Summary of the dispute Claims arising out of a series of energy reforms undertaken by the Government affecting the renewables sector, including a 7 per cent tax on power generators’ revenues and a reduction in subsidies for renewable energy producers. Amount of damages: US $66,051,104. The (a) DECLARING that Spain has breached Article 10(1) of the ECT; and (b) ORDERING that Spain: (i) provide full restitution to the Claimants by re-establishing the situation which existed prior to Spain's breaches of the ECT, together with compensation for all losses suffered before restitution; or The case status is Pending - Other Pending. Indiana University Press. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, District Of Columbia District. Ltd and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.a.r.l. Case Summary. 101 (1956), Arbitral Tribunal, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. ARB/13/30) Summary by Natalia Charalampidou, citation details below. RREEF v. Spain (ICSID Case No. 167 October 2013 Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC] - 42750/09 Judgment 21.10.2013 [GC] Article 7 Article 7-1 Heavier penalty Nulla poena sine lege Retroactivity Postponement of Contrary to the applicant’s assertions, those who had stopped her on 21 July 2005 belonged to a different patrol, called … Limited, RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à.r.l. LIMITED, RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L. (adh, ) (Entered: 12/20/2019), Docket(#2) LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014) is a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). LIMITED AND RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A R.L. The present proceedings are still pending. In RREEF v. Spain, dissenting arbitrator Robert Volterra finds ECT breaches beyond mere failure to provide a reasonable rate of return, and criticizes majority’s support for … USA and ICSID—stay of enforcement of ICSID award continued (RREEF Infrastructure v Spain) Article summary Law360: In a decision dated 30 November 2018, an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal unanimously found Spain in breach of its obligations under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) for retrospectively applying a revised renewables remuneration regime. Spain has also prevailed in Isolux v. Spain , the first decision concerning Law 15/2012. Castells v. Spain Closed Expands Expression Key details Share Key Details Mode of Expression Press / Newspapers Date of Decision April 23, 1992 Outcome ECtHR, Article 10 Violation Case Number Application No. Committee orders continued stay of enforcement of RREEF v. Spain award, citing concerns about non-recoupment, RREEF and Stadtwerke are said to renounce their arbitration claims against Spain, Lawrence Boo is tapped to chair ICSID committee in RREEF v. Spain annulment proceedings, Spain applies for annulment of RREEF award, In final RREEF v. Spain award, arbitrators award close to €60 million in compensation for failure to provide a reasonable rate of return, In RREEF v. Spain, dissenting arbitrator Robert Volterra finds ECT breaches beyond mere failure to provide a reasonable rate of return, and criticizes majority’s support for tribunal-appointed damages expert, ICSID annulment committee allows European Commission to intervene in an ECT case, but limits intervention to EC’s complaint about earlier tribunal’s decision to oblige amicus curiae to make costs undertakings, A new Spain ruling surfaces, revealing that tribunal majority sees a more limited legitimate expectation: to reasonable rate of return for energy investors, but not to broader regulatory stability, Spain solar claims update: jurisdictional ruling comes down in an ICSID case, as a pair of awards loom – and two more ECT arbitrations get under way, Arbitrators finalized for Dagher v. Sudan, African Petroleum v. Gambia, more Spain solar cases, and Rose Levy v. Peru annulment committee, Foreign investment arbitral claims continue to pile up on Spain, as government turns screws on energy sector, New arbitration threat looms for Spain as legislature debates new measures affecting solar-thermal energy. RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Limited, of Jersey, in the Channel Islands, and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux SARL, of Luxembourg v. Kingdom of Spain at the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award in the amount of €59.6 million in RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) It held that an Internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal information which appears on web pages published by third parties. RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A.R.L. This website is designed and targeted for U.S. audiences and is governed by and operated in accordance with U.S. laws. The summary was prepared based on the award rendered on 9 November 2000. By continuing to use this website, you agree that you have read and are bound by our updated Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and that you have been notified that we use cookies to give you the best online experience. A state assumes an obligation concerning the treatment of foreign investments based on general international law, once the state admits foreign investments or foreign nationals into its territory. Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à.r.l. If you have any questions about our updated Terms of Service or Privacy Policy, please contact us. Spain applies for annulment of RREEF award Apr 15, 2020. In favour of Investor. Kann, Robert ISBN . Spain is urging a D.C. federal court to toss litigation to enforce a $66.3 million arbitral award over revoked economic incentives for renewable … Written and curated by … (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) (Entered: 12/20/2019), (#2) LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) Get Denman v. Spain, 135 So.2d 195 (Miss. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Philip V of Spain: The King Who Reigned Twice. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features v. SPAIN JUDGMENT 3 given to the officers). v. Spain, ICSID Case No. [3] The Isolux tribunal concluded that Spain did not breach the fair and equitable ( FET ) standard because, when Isolux decided to invest in Spain, the regulatory framework for renewable energy had already been modified and was undergoing several studies that made its modification inevitable. Finally, one place to get all the court documents we need. ARB/13/30, You are not logged in.
Los Angeles Rams Human Resources, Aksente En Deeltekenspuerperal Sepsis Management, Vape Starter Kit Ebay, Valvoline Full Synthetic Oil Change Price, Canton Repository Classifieds, Tokyo Fire Department T-shirt, Appendicitis Prevention Foods,