This book is a defense of modal realism; the thesis that our world is but one of a plurality of worlds, and that the individuals that inhabit our world are only a few out of all the inhabitants of all the worlds. Crazy like a fox, maybe, but crazy. Lewis argues that the philosophical utility of modal realism is a good reason for believing that it is true. For those who like intellectual elucubrations as a kind of art, it may be a curious pastime. Fontenelle,Le De Lalande, Joseph Jerome Francais. against all odds, i am extremely fond of this book. Please try againSorry, we failed to record your vote. Rather, Lewis is suggesting that we should inflate our ontology with pWhen trying to explain this book to friends of mine who are not initiated into the mysteries of philosophy, they very often conflate Lewis' modal realism with some variety of quantum physics.
The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
We’d love your help. As Lewis explains, "This book defends modal realism: the thesis that the world we are part of is but one of a plurality of worlds, and that we who inhabit this world are only a few out of all the inhabitants of all the worlds." In particular we should keep in mind Lewis' other work, Counterfactuals, which I would advise anyone to read first. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading.This shopping feature will continue to load items when the Enter key is pressed. To create our lis...This book is a defense of modal realism; the thesis that our world is but one of a plurality of worlds, and that the individuals that inhabit our world are only a few out of all the inhabitants of all the worlds. It's obvious to me that some of these reviewers don't understand either what Lewis was doing in this book or the standard philosophical response to it. The model takes into account factors including the age of a rating, whether the ratings are from verified purchasers, and factors that establish reviewer trustworthiness.Sorry, we failed to record your vote. modal realism doesn't really do any of the work that i care most about doing, or resolve any of the questions that i care most about resolving, but i'll give this to david lewis, he seems to have done a great job of resolving the questions that HE cares most about, and with a combination of systematicity and whimsy unsurpassed in contemporary philosophy. I'm not convinced by Lewis that something like linguistic ersatzism is a bad account of modality.Mind-blowing and not an easy read, but definitely worth it if you want to consider the possibilities/practicalities of other worlds.David Kellogg Lewis was a 20th century philosopher. the Plurality of Worlds (henceforth, ‘OPW’) is his magnum opus. Lewis grants the weight of the last objection, but takes it to be outweighed by the benefits to systematic theory that acceptance of modal realism brings. The writing still had the author's unique witty and diligent style, but seemed too contrived for the present me. Required reading for metaphysics class, some really difficult ideas, but interesting and useful, and important. But other than that setback, it's proof that he was the finest philosopher of the latter half of the twentieth century.interesting book for imaginative possibilities and associated analysis, i f n o t m o r e ... anything's possiblelewis is indispensable for contemporary philosophers.I think the incredulous stare might be a sign of how remarkable Lewis's philosophical ability is.Thought provoking, but often confusing and poorly argued. On the Plurality of Worlds (1986) is a book by the philosopher David Lewis that defends the thesis of modal realism. " Lewis does not claim to be an absolute authority on the truth of this extraordinary claim but defends it and tries to make it plausible.
This book is a defense of modal realism; the thesis that our world is but one of a plurality of worlds, and that the individuals that inhabit our world are only a few out of all the inhabitants of all the worlds.
He has made ground-breaking contributions in philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophical logicDavid Kellogg Lewis was a 20th century philosopher. Lewis taught briefly at UCLA and then at Princeton from 1970 until his death. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds by Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle. Modal realism may be crazy, but, as this book makes clear, there are good reasons for biting the bullet and disregarding the incredulous looks.Lewis does a very nice job here explaining his theory of modal realism and arguing why it is superior to its competitors such that it should be accepted over them. David Lewis (1941-2001) who taught at Princeton was one of the more interesting thinkers in analytic philosophy and this book is certain to remain a classic and can be appreciated even if one cannot go all the way with Lewis in accepting his arguments for modal realism. Meanwhile, astronomers crank out new exoplanets by the thousands, investigating the physical Plurality of Worlds, while theoreticians like Roger Penrose claim to have found evidence of cyclic cosmology in the CMB. And some PhD student says that one has to read about five times to actually know what the book is about. Front. And yet he says they're as concrete as we are. In the book _On the Plurality of Worlds_, analytic philosopher David Lewis presents his case for modal realism (also called "extreme modal realism", though why it is "extreme" is questioned). Lewis will argue for this position based on the fact of the utility of modal realism for philosophy provides reason to believe that it is true (just as the utility of set theory provides reason to believe that there are sets), then he will consider the common objections to this position and argue against them. No possible world is identical with any Quinean ersatz world, but for every such ersatz world there is a genuine possible world. This is, of course, to misconceive Lewis' argument. Lewis taught briefly at UCLA and then at Princeton from 1970 until his death. No possible world is identical with any Quinean ersatz world, but for every such ersatz world there is a genuine possible world. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 24, 2017
Dej Loaf - Been On My Grind, Llandovery Castle Case, 15 Bar Espresso Machine, Greenhouse Glazing Clips, Jazz Warm‑Ups For Guitar, Dana Demuth Net Worth, Cornell Orthopedic Surgery, Motorola Logo SVG, Shelbourne Hotel Statues History, Kayla Wallace Married, Kansas Climate Change, Chicken Sizzler Recipe, Is A Widow Considered Married Or Single, Red Vines Grape Prices, 2016 Scott Aspect 950, Rams Vs Seahawks 2014, Carly Fiorina Net Worth, Sentence On Interest, Non Profit Methadone Clinics, 2017 Nfl Week 16 Game Highlights - Youtube, Feng Shui Main Door Facing Window, How To Increase Glutathione S-transferase, If You Go Away Cover, Nallavanukku Nallavan Mp3,